Telescopes, microscopes, atom-smashers, and fMRI brain scanners—these are just some of the technologies scientists depend on to untangle the material mysteries of the universe and our all-too-human lives within it. But alongside each new material explanation, we hear a familiar charge: “Reductionism!” cry the opponents of the mere material— “We are no clockwork machine!”
And along with them I wonder, too—what happens to meaning when a woman is reduced to sub-atomic particles? Where is love in a vibrating string? Do these wonderful new tools of discovery really reduce us to blind/meaningless things? Are we left cold, loveless, and forlorn under the weight of our new understanding? On the other hand, are the most widely promoted alternatives—religious mythologies grounded in the visions of prophets and theologians—relevant to modern life? Or have they too become a thin gruel in which to find meaning—so out of sync with our lives that in many cases they prove more harmful than helpful?
I believe this is a false dilemma. While I contend that revealed religions are indeed outdated and in many cases an obstacle to harmonious society, what science reveals through its ever-reducing explanations of our existence—expands, not forsakes, meaning—and it does so in a way that belief in a deity or supernatural cosmic purpose never could. Technology uncovers the multiple sources and layers of our emergence into the world from stars to mud to love—and in this uncovering, we find the meaningfulness of our lives inescapable.
Over the next few weeks, I’m going to blog you a Model of Everything that, I hope, will make the argument above clear, optimistic, and irresistible!
May 2, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Science and technology expand meaning in a way that is so inescapable we no longer need belief in god or religion?
The loyal opposition awaits your arguments with interest.
May 3, 2010 at 11:43 am
i would love to read a Model of Everything blog…right up my alley!
p.s.- will there be any mentions of Lost or quotes from Star Wars?
May 4, 2010 at 1:50 pm
I would submit that expanded knowledge in science and technology does not necessarily preclude a belief in diety. Although, I have yet to find an organized religion out there that addresses or embraces new scientific or technological knowledge. Maybe it is not the belief but is instead the belief system that fails.
May 4, 2010 at 2:27 pm
Crystal, that’s fair… I guess I just want to show that deities are not NECESSARY for finding meaning, that a meaningful life is just as real regardless of the reality of god(s)…